|
Opinion of toolsName of the case study Name of tool Opinion of tool - argumentation for choosing the tool Sustainability considerations were made throughout the planning stage of the project, so when the Indicator tool was applied, a high score was achieved. The tool produces a radar diagram indicating scores for design, economic, construction and environment. A benchmark is provided for previous projects which can be compared to the projects final score. As the tool had not formally been used to guide planning of the project these results were not submitted for endorsement. Examples of questions asked include: ´has a target for water consumption been set for the construction phase?´ positive points are obtained for yes. This is then followed by ´Is consumption better than the last quarter?´ where on target or better than set targets achieve additional points. Points are accumulated and a final score is accumulated which is compared with benchmark projects. Opinion of tool - barriers for the tool implementation Name of tool Opinion of tool - argumentation for choosing the tool The dispute resolution ladder was developed at the partnering workshop and then written by the Neath Port Talbot Borough Council Environmental Consultant working on the project. The ladder was then signed up to by everyone who signed the charter. This was the outcome of a debate on dispute resolution so other initiatives were considered. Opinion of tool - barriers for the tool implementation Name of tool Opinion of tool - argumentation for choosing the tool Opinion of tool - barriers for the tool implementation Name of tool Opinion of tool - argumentation for choosing the tool The use of ISO 14001 was identified as a plus point in the contractor selection process. The use of the HGJV system was agreed at the tenderer selection stage subject to verification by the client. There was felt no need to have two quality systems on a partnering site. The client felt the HGJV system was more than adequate to ensure a good finished product. The alternative would have been two systems, the second being the NPTCBC system. This was considered unnecessary. Responsibility for implementation of the EMS lay with the Contract Manager although the Construction Supervisor who was an employee of the Client operated the system on site. Opinion of tool - barriers for the tool implementation Name of tool Opinion of tool - argumentation for choosing the tool Opinion of tool - barriers for the tool implementation Name of tool Opinion of tool - argumentation for choosing the tool Opinion of tool - barriers for the tool implementation Name of tool Opinion of tool - argumentation for choosing the tool The decision to implement partnering was taken by the Baglan Energy Park Steering Group following suggestion by NPTCBC. A detailed report was procured from the site Cost Consultant and a detailed strategy determined and agreed. Opinion of tool - barriers for the tool implementation Opinion of tool - assessment by tool users Other comments include that by fulfilling the indicator criteria the organisation undertaking it has the desire to strive towards sustainability, rather than to achieve a ´badge´ for sustainability. This tool is therefore only likely to be used by those who are genuinely concerned to be sustainable. Although the Constructing Excellence Sustainability Indicator is a transferable tool, it has not been implemented again within NPTCBC as it is only a small municipality with few projects large enough in which to implement tools such as the Constructing Excellence Sustainability Indicator Tool. Since its use in Baglan Energy Park, the Partnership Scheme is now widely used within Welsh local government. NPTCBC recommend ´partnership´ as a useful tool and are supportive of a change in council practices to allow the partnership approach to continue. The Hochtief/Griffiths QUENSH plan has provided a process to for the project to follow. However the tool at present doesn’t provide a formal plan for waste and recycling, although since the tool is constantly being redeveloped and improved it is likely to formally include such issues shortly. Although created for this one-off joint partnership project, the Hochtief/Griffiths QUENSH tool has been used on 3 to 4 other projects due its success and clarity. Although the tool is not available to the public, the tool concept could be developed and implemented. Opinion of tool - reviewer\'s assessment KPI´s have a number of positive features: With regards to an Environmental Management System the structure of the tool already exists and the stages to develop an EMS are well defined. The Hochtief/Griffiths QUENSH plan is a valuable tool to have in place for those working in industries with a lot of legislation. The adaptability of the plan ensures that the tool is applicable to a range of projects and that all aspects can be considered. What tools were used to assess sustainability? Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Environmental management system: ISO 14001 Hochtief/Griffiths QUENSH (Quality, Environment, Safety and Health) plan Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) More information |