 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Decision making process
Name of the case study
Maurice Audin Storm Water Detention Basin
Decision making process
The project was triggered off by a petition from the district inhabitants, and by a letter from the City Mayor to the Department. The decision making process was then based on a dialogue between the different actors of the project.
Consequently, studies and inquiries were done in order to conceive the project and its financial management. Meetings were then organised to present the project to the public.
From the consultation procedure, the following orientations were raised:
- creation of a site easy to use for inhabitants
- creation of a site open to public with play activities
- preservation of enclosures with well defined entries in the strategic points
- active participation of the actors involved in the urban life of the district: the municipality and the population for maintenance of the site.
Name of tool
Meetings and inquiries
Decision making process - tools in decision-making process
During the works, an important effort on communication was done: educative signing was set to explain the project progress to the inhabitants, and the site had to be watched over by a guardian to avoid damages.
Name of tool
Partnership
Decision making process - tools in decision-making process
During the works, an important effort on communication was done: educative signing was set to explain the project progress to the inhabitants, and the site had to be watched over by a guardian to avoid damages.
Name of tool
Real time control system
Decision making process - tools in decision-making process
During the works, an important effort on communication was done: educative signing was set to explain the project progress to the inhabitants, and the site had to be watched over by a guardian to avoid damages.
Name of tool
Consultation
Decision making process - tools in decision-making process
During the works, an important effort on communication was done: educative signing was set to explain the project progress to the inhabitants, and the site had to be watched over by a guardian to avoid damages.
Decision making process - how was the information for the dmp disseminated
This project could be realised thanks to petition of the inhabitants. Then, it became feasible thanks to the collaboration between the Municipality and the Department.
As it is mentioned previously a strong consultation was made with the surrounding inhabitants at the stage of the project inception. It was to get a good knowledge of the social and urban context of the detention basin, and also of the inhabitant´s perception, expectations and fears about the potential site renewal without missing the technical aspects.
Decision making process - how was the public involved
This project could be realized thanks to petition of the inhabitants. Then, it became feasible thanks to the collaboration between the Municipality and the Department.
As it is mentioned previously a strong consultation was made with the surrounding inhabitants at the stage of the project inception. It was to get a good knowledge of the social and urban context of the detention basin, and also of the inhabitant´s perception, expectations and fears about the potential site renewal without missing the technical aspects.
Decision making process - was there public discussion over the project
See public involvement.
What tools were used to assess sustainability?
Meetings and inquiries
Partnership
Real time control system
Consultation
More information